Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edificio Olympo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. with a leave for speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Edificio Olympo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unremarkable building in relation to height. Night of the Big Wind talk  01:41, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Building has interesting and remarkable architecture. Also, meets the requirements of Wikipedia and Category:Skyscrapers between 50 and 99 meters. Subtropical-man (talk) 14:06, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete I can't see anything that would constitute it being any bit notable. The only way this would pass GNG is if there was something exceptional about the architecture or use but there isn't, it's a pretty standard multi-use builidng. tutterMouse (talk) 00:48, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Question: Subtropical-man, what are the requirements of Category:Skyscrapers between 50 and 99 meters? Location (talk) 05:16, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Question: Re: These "between 50 and 99 meters". :) Subtropical-man (talk) 14:34, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I inferred from your earlier comment that there was a difference between a notable building that is 50 to 99 meters tall and a non-notable building that is 50 to 99 meters tall. I don't think that all buildings that fit in the category are necessarily notable. Location (talk) 14:56, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Re: I has different opinion. Also building has interesting and remarkable architecture. Subtropical-man (talk) 15:00, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Question: Can you cite a source for that claim? W.E. (talk) 13:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  05:59, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.