Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edil A.S.V


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete, WP:CSD A7, no assertion of importance.  Dei zio  talk 08:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Edil A.S.V
Completely unnotable computer games blogger, written in an unencyclopedic tone by the subject. - Hahnch e  n 01:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - "XtremeGamer.com" doesn't exist, and the subject's blog at IGN only contains 31 posts dating back to March 2006. Appears to fail WP:NN. Caknuck 03:07, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete NN. Resolute 03:16, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom (WP:NOT). Jpe|ob 05:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a notable individual. Games reviewers need to achieve exceptional fame to be really notable here, but Edil doesn't appear to have done so. Daveydw ee b ( chat/patch ) 06:38, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Daveydw ee b ( chat/patch ) 06:38, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. Cnwb 07:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete As a non-notable blogger, and if it is written by the subject then it is a vanity article and can be tagged as such (A7 I think it is) Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 12:09, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Hello32020 12:39, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a weasel-worded, non-notable vanity page and advert. The Kinslayer 13:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It is widely believed that Islay doesn't like it when people write about themselves in the third person and use weasel words. -- I sl a y So lo mo n  |  t a l k  17:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Freaking ridiculous.UberCryxic 18:23, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.