Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edin Lynch (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Edin Lynch
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

non-notable footballer  Chief Minister      (Talk)   09:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.   Chief Minister      (Talk)   09:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete the old AfD from December 2020 still applies here. SportingFlyer  T · C  10:02, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete as per SportingFlyer - the old AfD was actually closed and the page deleted earlier this year. Nothing's changed either in the information presented or the arguments from January. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - still doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG and now signed for a club in the third tier of Scottish football so can't see even a good argument for draftifying currently. Recent coverage is nothing more than a sentence about his transfer in Daily Record. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and SALT per consensus ta last AFD, and a trout to for re-creating. GiantSnowman 13:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete My apologies everyone. I thought that appearances in the Scottish Championship qualified a player as meeting the guidelines - but from reading up on the updated guidelines that does not appear to be the case any longer. I also didn't realise that a page on the same topic had already been deleted previously. FYI two further pages I created a few years ago might also need deleted? Ross Lyden and Kyle Prior as they only made a limited number of appearances in that league - which was not fully professional at the time? I'll leave that over to you guys to decide. Thanks. F.
 * there is still consensus that the Scottish Championship was fully pro until 2019-20 so those other footballers do (although only just) pass WP:NFOOTBALL. Lynch doesn't as his appearances came at a time that it was clear that there were semi pro players in that league, therefore we were not able to call it a fully professional league as per WP:FPL. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:53, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Although it's strange. The Scottish Championship has rarely been a fully pro league. In the 2016-17 season there were two part-time clubs (Dumbarton and Ayr United) just as there was last season. I understand that it wouldn't be effective to change the guidelines season-by-season though. Especially for a small league! Take care, F.


 * Delete - As others have said, under current guidelines does not meet notability requirements. Dunarc (talk) 22:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Non notable player. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 03:24, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. However, given the player is still active and could meet NFOOTY in the future and the article was recreated in good faith, I would be opposed to SALTing as some have suggested. Smartyllama (talk) 18:25, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I would tend to agree - as I said in the previous AFD he his young enough that he could yet meet notability (eg by playing in a fully professional league), and the recreation of the article was clearly done in good faith. Dunarc (talk) 18:47, 15 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.