Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edina Leković


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There's consensus that Leković is notable; any issues with the article's quality are surmountable and thus can be addressed through the editing process. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Edina Leković

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not Notable. No Reliable sources. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 22:14, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 22:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 22:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 22:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 22:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Seems to be a promotional article done by someone who does not know Wiki policies on RS and references, etc. Since it has been sitting in this state for a couple of years, that's more than enough time for improvement. And it has not happened. It's too bad, I do think this person is -probably- notable, but the article is not up to it. Alaney2k (talk) 01:19, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey Alaney2k, thanks for participating. If you think this person is probably notable, I encourage you to identify reliable sources. In particular, the lack of improvement over time (WP:NEGLECT) and low/promotional quality of the existing article (WP:RUBBISH) are both features of the article that can be changed, and are not overly relevant to the AfD process. Per WP:AFD, "If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD." In this case, it looks like the relevant WP:DEL-REASONs are, as usual, whether the article subject meets WP:BIO/WP:GNG. Thanks! Suriname0 (talk) 16:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - She seems to meet WP:GNG and WP:BIO. She has attracted coverage independent from her work as a talking head by a variety of national US news outlets, e.g. Reuters and NPR. Related coverage during the opening of a "women's mosque". She was listed in the inaugural The 500 Most Influential Muslims, although it's not clear to me how important that is. Other sources I looked at: Short profile as part of list in a local magazine. Coverage of her as an expert in UT Austin's student paper. An interview at the Center for American Progress, so not independent. Suriname0 (talk) 23:36, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep for the reasons Suriname0 has already stated. She's clearly notable. WestCD (talk) 02:57, 7 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep as per sources provided above. Suonii180 (talk) 10:43, 8 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.