Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edinburgh Defense


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:SNOWBALL -- The Anome (talk) 10:19, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Edinburgh Defense

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced, and apparently unverifiable, neologism. Fails WP:V criterion. The Anome (talk) 03:51, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Not the least bit notable. It's even hard to find a public reference from even a non-reputable source. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 07:11, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Based on Google, "Edinburgh defense/defence" is something sports teams from Edinburgh have, it's not a phrase used in this context. Non-notable neologism. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 23 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Just because you call it something different, doesn't change it from Troll (internet). Not notable enough to even warrent a redirect. Turlo Lomon (talk) 13:34, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Term invented on an internet forum; may be notable among members of that forum, but it hasn't attracted any coverage in reliable sources per a search. Effectively WP:NEO and doesn't meet WP:GNG by a mile. Recommend quick close and delete. --Batard0 (talk) 06:23, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.