Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edison Gonzalez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Edison Gonzalez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Plays for a team who are currently in the USL Premier Development League - an amateur football league. TYelliot &#124;  Talk  &#124;  Contribs  02:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  J i m Carter  ( talk ) 02:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  J i m Carter  ( talk ) 02:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:49, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 12:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Player has not played in fully professional league, nor played senior international football, so fails NFOOTY. No indication of any other achievements garnering significant reliable coverage to achieve GNG. Fenix down (talk) 13:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - It's not fully professional, and players in the league don't automatically deserve articles. But it's semi-professional - not amateur. Nfitz (talk) 03:40, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete – topic does not meet the standards of notability as given above. C679 04:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.