Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edison High School (Fresno, California)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Withdrawn/Keep. Carlossuarez46 18:51, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Edison High School (Fresno, California)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD 1 day before expiry. This high school doesn't assert any notability. Rjd0060 00:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: Based on the work of User:Alansohn. Rjd0060 15:47, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete No assertion of notability whatsoever. Hús  ö  nd  01:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Article may be a stub but there are references that establish some notability. See Fresno Bee article, Scout article, Fresno Bee article from 1939 -- Hdt 83     Chat 01:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Article does not assert notability. Tiptoety 01:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Hdt83. Law/Disorder 01:43, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: Per Hdt83, it has received coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Though it does need expansion. Tiptoety 01:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Received 3rd party coverage and high schools are notable. --Oakshade 04:35, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep High Schools are notable, sure it can be improved but let it be a stub. A lot of excellent High School pages have been created that started out this way.Moheroy 07:11, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Above and beyond the general consensus summarized at WP:OUTCOMES that high schools are notable, this article provides details on its programs and alumni, accompanied with reliable and verifiable sources, to establish notability. Alansohn 13:11, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Your comment above makes the entire AfD reason that I provided look misleading, so I feel it appropriate to point out that you greatly added to the article since the AfD began. Good Work!! - Rjd0060 15:47, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * While I am of the opinion that almost all high schools have the sources to be expanded as this one has, the article as it existed when the AfD was initiated was no more than a stub. There is no reason to believe that the nomination was misleading or anything other than good faith. Thanks for being sufficiently open-minded to change your opinion based on the recent edits. Alansohn 15:56, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - more great work by Alansohn has clearly established notability. TerriersFan 17:16, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, article appears notable. I presume it's been expanded since nomination, good for it. CRGreathouse (t | c) 18:00, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - nice work. Arthur 18:50, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.