Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edith Cody-Rice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Edith Cody-Rice

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable lawyer, being an inhouse counsel is not notable and Who's who doesn't show notability per WP:BIO.  MBisanz  talk 14:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:10, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * Delete. I previously PRODDED then reverted as article had only just been restored from previous deletion (per page logs). Article still fails to establish notability. Can not find indepth sources, small coverage in Who's Who doesn't do it for me per NOT#DIRECTORY, notable husband, but notability is not inherited.-- Club Oranje T 02:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - if she's in Canadian Who's Who and considered sufficient of an authority to appear before Canadian Parliamentary Committees on a regular basis, what's the point of deleting? Opbeith (talk) 13:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * (Response): Entry in Who's Who is not evidence of notability.  The WP essay on agruments to avoid in deletion discussions advises against what's the point-type arguments against deletion.  Wikipeterproject (talk) 00:35, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Does not meet the notability guidelines of WP;BIO in that "she has not received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".  There are a maybe 15 news articles archived over the last two decades and a number of passing references in other publications.  This falls far short of the "significant coverage" requirement.  Wikipeterproject (talk) 00:40, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.