Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Editions of You


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to For Your Pleasure. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:46, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Editions of You

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No content, sources, or notability for an article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:59, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  22:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. No awards, no chart, no covers, no WP:RS.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 02:17, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to For Your Pleasure. No need to create an AfD for an article that can simply be redirected by being WP:BOLD. --JD554 (talk) 10:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:49, 30 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Be bold, Redirect. Duffbeerforme (talk) 12:54, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to For Your Pleasure. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 14:06, 30 April 2009 (UTC))
 * Redirect. A lack of notability for a separate article, is insufficient reason to ignore the possibility to redirect the name or merge information in favor of deletion. Nominator shows no evidence of having done the research required by WP:BEFORE. - Mgm|(talk) 10:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.