Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Editorialist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. GNG appears to be met, a merger suggestion can be handled on the talk page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Editorialist

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional website content article. References are very poor. Press coverage questionable in nature. Nothing significant or notable about the website to be here. Light21 07:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep I created the page because the subject passed WP:GNG.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:05, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - There looks to be a notable subject here, but will just comment that in looking at the sources we certainly don't need a separate article for the magazine of the same name launched by the same group which is the subject of some of the sources in this article. That's not nominated here, though -- just a suggestion one be merged into the other. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 15:29, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep While not a slam dunk for WP:GNG, the coverage reasonable given that this is a niche topic area. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as passing GNG, but barely. I had also !voted to redirect the magazine to this article. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: Because of this. Safehaven86 (talk) 19:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:48, 25 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.