Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Editorialist (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Editorialist. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:23, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Editorialist (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Written for the purpose of being in Wikipedia for promotional advantages. All media coverage seems merely Press Release exercise. Founders are notable for the company they worked earlier. Does not fit for notability in wikipedia. No significant coverage by media. Light21 17:13, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Light2021 (talk) 14:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * , I take offense to your guess regarding my motivations.--18:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * delete it does get a little attention, my search here:, but I have a hard time arguing for notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge with Editorialist. Not enough content to merit separate entities, notability is intertwined. OhNo itsJamie Talk' 19:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Editorialist (web site); not independently notable. Anything useful can be picked up from the article history. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to Editorialist. Seems there's a notable subject, but we don't need separate articles for both at this point. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 22:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to Editorialist. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 23:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to Editorialist, per everyone above. Safehaven86 (talk) 22:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.