Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmond Cullinan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  01:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Edmond Cullinan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Cant see why he is notable. Supposed academic. Potentially notable. Write for the Furrow but sources seem to be primary. Fails WP:NAUTHOR, WP:SIGCOV   scope_creep Talk  00:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors,  and Ireland. Shellwood (talk) 00:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete While I was able to find sources, all of them seemed to be primary. This violates SIGCOV, which requires sources to be "independent of the subject." The books are also not notable, as they do not have coverage in reliable sources. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:CFD:F514:CDE6:9187 (talk) 01:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I found and added references to three published reviews of two books (two in the same journal as each other and the third apparently only offline) to the article. It's not quite enough to convince me of WP:AUTHOR notability, but I could change my mind if more turn up. Note that many of the things listed in the publications section of the article are not actually books. ——David Eppstein (talk) 02:24, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I couldn't turn up anything more than what David Eppstein already found. -- asilvering (talk) 07:10, 12 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.