Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmund Burke (poet)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:01, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Edmund Burke (poet)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CREATIVE and is unnotable. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:27, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: I would agree, but I hope that none of the work attributed to this Edmund Burke is from has been conflated with/from the famous author and philosopher of the same name, Edmund Burke (see here). Quis separabit?  23:34, 7 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not notable. Bali88 (talk) 00:45, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ~Super Hamster  Talk Contribs 01:19, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. ~Super Hamster  Talk Contribs 01:20, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 8 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete When the article starts off saying the subject pretty much didn't do anything, you know things are about to go downhill. But for the record; the subject fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, and WP:CREATIVE. Probably a strong A-7 candidate. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:32, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable.Libertas80 (talk) 17:47, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. References are inadequate to establish notability. RomanSpa (talk) 08:01, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.