Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmund F. Murphy III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Edmund F. Murphy III

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

inadequate evidence for notability. Contributed by the same ed. who wrote an article on his company, and nothing else. No separate notability.  DGG ( talk ) 07:57, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:12, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:12, 25 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- a glorified CV. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:16, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Seems to be self published and self promoting. Creator seems connected. Reb1981 (talk) 02:40, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - no sig cov in independent sources. Neutralitytalk 03:17, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.Icewhiz (talk) 06:53, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Some additional information added related to retirement policy advocacy. theWalter 10:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete people testifying before congressional committees are a dime a dozen. Such an act alone does not make them notable, and nothing else here comes even close to making him notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.