Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmund February


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:09, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Edmund February

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Only links are his personal page at UCT and a self-published blog (Climb ZA). The page is supposed to be about a botanist but has no botany related info. Wyatt Tyrone Smith (talk) 19:27, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:45, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:45, 17 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable individual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:09, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OUTCOMES, WP:BLP, and WP:PROF. We almost never keep articles about associate professors, unless they've written something cited in many of our articles. Bearian (talk) 13:04, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV. I did find several peer reviewed journal articles by him in ProQuest, and a few which cited his research or acknowledged his help in specimen collection. However, it's not enough to meet the criteria at WP:NACADEMIC.4meter4 (talk) 03:29, 25 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.