Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmund Homa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 11:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Edmund Homa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Probably good, but nonnotable chair designer Staszek Lem (talk) 03:52, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  07:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  07:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  07:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:03, 23 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * One possible mention of him in this German source, but can't say this subject is notable enough. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 00:55, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. On pl wiki he is auto-notable due to being professor (pl wiki treats all professors as notable). But for en wiki, I can't find anything to help him pass WP:PROF, ARTIST or GNG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 17:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:42, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks the adequate notability. His publications (whether in English or Polish) cannot be traced on Web of Science or other major scientific database to meet the notability criteria. Arashtitan  15:30, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Are you serious? This is a designer, not a scientist. --Hegvald (talk) 19:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.