Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmund Mahony


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SarahStierch (talk) 07:17, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Edmund Mahony

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Small district councilor only. Lacks any depth of coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. (The Cyclopedia of New Zealand is vanity publishing). One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:33, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &eta;oian   &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  11:26, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:33, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:33, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:33, 14 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep: important early lawyer in Auckland; discussed in Portrait of a Profession (standard history of the new Zealand legal profession), edited by Lord Cook.Rick570 (talk) 21:40, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Important according to who? Does the book mention or discuss him? What does that one page say? What other sources are there? duffbeerforme (talk) 02:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 20:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Made contribution to early legal history of New Zealand and Auckland. Well-referenced to reputable source.Rick570 (talk) 20:47, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Please don't !vote twice. Just making a contribution does not make him notable. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete As per nom. Fails GNG, fails SIGCOV. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 19:18, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.