Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduardo Álvaro Rodríguez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:56, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Eduardo Álvaro Rodríguez

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

According to the information the subjects meets WP:NFOOTBALL in that Club Deportivo Los Millonarios play in a fully professional league. However, the information must be verifiable for inclusion, and I can find no sources that he has played with the team. I found information on football players named Eduardo Rodríguez, but one played in the 1940s and the other in 1999, this subject was born in 1989. The club's website makes no mention of him either. — J04n(talk page) 02:44, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions.  —— J04n(talk page) 02:44, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  —— J04n(talk page) 02:44, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:26, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 14:33, 23 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - His name is mentioned on a couple of websites, but I couldn't find any information to verify whether he actually played for the club. J Mo 101 (talk) 16:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, as he fails both WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. --Carioca (talk) 21:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - as unverifiable. Its possible he may meet WP:ATHLETE but unless it can be verified, this article should be deleted. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:20, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.