Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduardo Berlin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Eduardo Berlin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I see no claim or evidence of notability. ELEKHHT 10:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. ELEKHHT 10:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. ELEKHHT 10:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I went through and cleaned up the sources. Once redundant, irrelevant and sel-published sources are discounted or removed, there are three genuine sources: a Harvard news release, a Platform Architectura article and something in an architecture magazine. Three sources do not add up to a notable subject for an article.New Media Theorist (talk) 15:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 02:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now as my searches found nothing better than this. SwisterTwister   talk  06:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't see any relevance in two prizes or living in Boston. -- Keysanger (talk) 14:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.