Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduardo Kau


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Eduardo Kau

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV. Of the three sources in the article, and  are routine transfer stories and  is a database listing from Sovverway. I was unable to find anything significant during a search. Alvaldi (talk) 11:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shawn Teller (hy/hym) (talk) 15:54, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Alvaldi (talk) 11:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, passes GNG, see for example this and this, and I think transfer coverage goes beyond routine with some personal coverage.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * is a trivial story with three short paragraphs about him being injured (we get his age, that he is injured and that he has played 3 games during the season), is a routine transfer story (A single line of him being signed, a single line of what he did the previous season, a quote from him, another line based on a qoute from him and then a single line stating what other players the team has signed). Alvaldi (talk) 15:39, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't agree with your definition of what is trivial and routine, it's clearly that he's getting coverage outside the norm. Ortizesp (talk) 16:41, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete the first reference posted by Ortizesp has several sentences of non-trivial coverage and therefore is significant. However that alone is not enough for GNG passing.  Ortizesp‘s second ref and the ones already in the article are more of the routine variety.  I will reconsider my vote if more references are found, so please ping me.  Frank   Anchor  02:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. Agree with Frank's analysis - first source OK, second not enough. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per Ortizesp. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 19:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - The sources listed above are simply press releases; noticiasaominuto.com, ojogo.pt and iol.pt all have a nearly identical version of the 19 September 2019 press release about his injury lay-off picked up by record.pt (which is routine coverage), and record.pt and futebol365.pt carried a nearly identical version of the 4 July 2019 press release about his contract picked up by sapo.pt (also routine coverage). There is nothing online that comes close to WP:SIGCOV. Jogurney (talk) 02:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, the sources are utterly routine injury and transactional news. They're not SIGCOV, not independent (press releases), and violate NOTNEWS. JoelleJay (talk) 03:41, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: BLP, Fails GNG and BIO. BEFORE showed promos, database records, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Above sources have been addressed and do not show N, just ROUTINE news stories about joining a team and suffering a injury. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).  // Timothy :: talk  18:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.