Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education Side of Minecraft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. qedk (t 桜 c) 06:46, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Education Side of Minecraft

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Already mentioned in Minecraft, so unnecessary split; written like an advertisement, page title is completely wrong, and what the hell is the section "The Propaganda"???  Nixinova   T   C   19:48, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete, as the name is so odd I'm having a hard time rationalizing a redirect. Completely unecessary split from Minecraft at this point, and arbitrary. JamieWhat (talk) 20:39, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:GNG and unneeded split. The Education edition is already mentioned in main article and so is the game's use in education. There is nothing to merge as none of the non-primary sources here support any content other than Education version's release. No prejudice to eventually splitting off an article about the game's impact on education, but that would have to have way more properly-sourced content. — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 21:02, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, unnecessary spin-off from Minecraft, no relevant and substantial information that would merit its own article. Maybe it's WP:TOOSOON at this point and we can have a properly sourced (and correctly named) article solely on the educational uses of Minecraft at some point, but right now it's just retelling the Minecraft section in a somewhat strange way. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:35, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - notability is not transferable, and the sources listed in article cannot justify the passing of WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 23:22, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Minecraft. I have moved this to a more plausible redirect title, but the current content is hardly salvageable (so don't merge anything), and the sourcing is not enough to sustain an own article regardless of writing quality. Glades12 (talk) 08:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Already mentioned in the main article and no need for an article split as none of the WP:WHENSPLIT criteria are reasonably met. A redirect wouldn’t be right, since the title is an unlikely search term. — MarkH21talk 06:32, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Unnecesary spin-off article from Minecraft which is not notable enough for a split.  Spy-cicle💥   Talk? 21:28, 6 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.