Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education decides feminism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Education decides feminism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article appears to consist entirely of original research/personal essay, and would require substantial rewrite to fit into the encyclopaedia. TYelliot &#124;  Talk  &#124;  Contribs  07:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. We really need a speedy deletion category for personal essays such as this. Nick-D (talk) 08:37, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete (WP:NOTESSAY). Tigraan (talk) 10:05, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:17, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTESSAY. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 22:42, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 00:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I was going to lecture you about making "Delete per WP:FOO" !votes but after reading the article I realised there's not much to add. This topic seems to be fundamentally original research and even the title is an opinion, and the articles in Category:Feminism and education cover it fairly well, I think.  I'm not sure a speedy criterion for this would be good though because things like this take a while to read.  Anyway, yes, delete, and point the creator to Alternative outlets if that hasn't already been done, because it's well written and somewhat interesting.   ekips39 &#x2766; talk  00:48, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * "Delete per WP:X" are sometimes bad because they can be a petitio principii - by saying "guideline X ought to apply", they implicitly assume that guideline X has been violated without saying how. But here, any reasonable person will agree this is an essay... Tigraan (talk) 09:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.