Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education facilities industry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Education facilities industry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Fails WP:GNG. An unsourced article written in essay form. Exceeded 7 days using Proposed Deletion, however template was removed by creator. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   22:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  22:53, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. Article seems to exist mainly to point to Leading practice discovery another article by the same SPA user. Meters (talk) 21:23, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)




 * delete All ten book hits are chance juxtapositions; the content (as said above) seems to be an essay rather than an article. Mangoe (talk) 13:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.