Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education for Development


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:07, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Education for Development

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:ORG. one of the two sources is from the organisation's own website. gnews reveals at best 4 hits (with 2 passing mentions like a party for an employee). simply having some gnews coverage does not equate to notability. LibStar (talk) 13:46, 2 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. I'm sure it does great work, but we have to verify that it is notable, not its good works. Bearian (talk) 21:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.