Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education for sustainable development


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Education for sustainable development

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is an essay, largely presenting the views of the UN but in Wikipedia's voice. It is a violation of WP:NOTESSAY. Yes, the topic is notable and the article could be rewritten, but this rewriting would have to be comprehensive and has not taken place in the more than 10 years that the article has been in a terrible state. This is a case where we should apply WP:TNT. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:37, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. WP:TNT is an essay, not a policy or a guideline, and is used simply as an excuse for laziness. If a topic is notable, as this obviously is (just look at the Google Books hits above where you will see several books from academic publishers about this very topic), then anyone who is unhappy with the content should change it, which can include replacing it entirely, rather than call for deletion. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: The template added by Captain Raju (calling for help with improvements) is the appropriate response, not deletion. -- Gpc62 (talk) 05:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: The UN dedicated a whole decade (2005–2014) to the promotion of it. --Vihelik (talk) 00:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.