Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education in The Simpsons (2nd Nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete on strength of arguments. The previous discussion was a "no consensus", the "realwolrd information" is not relevant for the article (education of the authors), it is not indicated which parts may be worth keeping or merging... On the other hand, "I support deletion because X does" is an ignorable argument as well. Fram (talk) 13:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Education in The Simpsons
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I created this page about a year ago and I've decided that it's time to try to kill my own creation. It is just a random group of information - what schools the writers & characters went to, a list of schools, etc. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. There is also no real world info, other than the list of what writers went to Harvard, but that is complete listcruft. -- Scorpion0422 14:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 17:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom as primary author and echoing his concerns. Otto4711 (talk) 23:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I will support Scorpion on any WP:SIMPSONS matters. I will also usually support a primary contributor on matters in regard to changes to their article.  In this case, Scorpion and the author are the same.  – thedemonhog   talk  •  edits  02:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ditto. --Simpsons fan 66 07:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - it has be nominated before and the consensus was to keep so that should be it. Keep the page, end of story. Bhowden (talk) 07:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Consensus can change. Otto4711 (talk) 13:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, the there was no consensus. Part of the reason it wasn't deleted is because the nominator had nominated a half a dozen similar pages for the exact same reason, so it was basically a train wreck. One of those pages has since been deleted. -- Scorpion0422 13:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * All the more reason to reconsider the pages individually. Otto4711 (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Most of it is fancruft for fans of the show itself and the writers themselves. Martarius (talk) 20:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I have no real opinion in the deletion, but if it will be deleted, I would suggest to salvage any relevant information and merge it somewhere (probably Springfield Elementary School) the writers colleges could go on their own pages if they are not already there. Rhino131 (talk) 03:23, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's verifiable and it doesn't make Wikipedia an indiscriminate collection of information. The article contains real world information. --Pixelface (talk) 22:17, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge, some of the information here is worth keeping maybe move the parts worth keeping to another article. Asasinz (talk) 03:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research collection of info from the show. Little real world context for this non notable aspect of the show. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 08:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Maitch (talk) 11:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.