Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education of Bosnia and Herzegovina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Buck  ets  ofg 21:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Education of Bosnia and Herzegovina

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Found while doing Categories for speedy deletion. The deletion reason was "Not notable content form of this. Insufficient content to create a good article.". I'm neutral here. —— Eagle 101  Need help? 17:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep- has potential Astrotrain 19:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Current text cannot be salvaged, it is collection of trivia, boasting and abstract truths, with no facts inside. Pavel Vozenilek 23:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep notable as outline of a country's education system - although as it stands it replicates the text of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which must be dealt with. Totnesmartin 23:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Riddled with POV, is a content fork, insufficient content to create a good article, besides the fact that the subject is non notable.
 * Keep and Comment: Shouldn't this article be more accurately named as "Education in Bosnia and Herzegovina"? As for the "keep", I'd think an article about the education system in a country is worth an article, and this article is certainly salvageable. Agent 86 00:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep with rewrite. The topic is worthy, but a rewrite is needed. —dima/s-ko/ 04:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It just need reorganisation. --Kahriman 13:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a good article, but it could be improved. Bosniak 20:10, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Deletion's not good - rewrite, rather. --PaxEquilibrium 23:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as per PaxEquilibrium. May I suggest expansion of the article rather than deletion. --Crna Gora 01:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. A thorough rewrite is needed but the topic is clearly notable and Wikipedia should have an article about it. WjBscribe 05:19, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite - Right now this is identical to Bosnia_and_Herzegovina, should be cleaned up, expanded here, then summary of new version update on the BiH article.// Laughing Man 06:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.