Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Educomp Solutions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  09:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Educomp Solutions

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Similar challenges as other related articles, which have been deleted or are at AfD. Sourcing is limited to run of the mill listings, acquisitions and nothing to meet WP:ORG. Thoughts? Star  Mississippi  21:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  21:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  21:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  21:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Related articles as mentioned in nom: Articles for deletion/Ebix, Articles for deletion/Ebix Smartclass Star   Mississippi  21:56, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee  //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 02:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: First of all, an article is supposed to be judged by its own content and its notability cannot be disputed if "so-called" similar articles created by the same editor have got notability issues. I understand that this article has some presentation issues and needs to worked upon in terms of rewriting and rearranging all the stuffs in an encyclopedic manner, but questioning it's notability just because other related articles have got "so-called" similar issues is utterly nonsense. I would like the nominator and others to go through this Money Control article, which clearly states that this company was the first education entrepreneurship of India, and according this Economic Times article, this company was at a point of time "India's largest technology-driven education company". Derivator2017 (talk) 09:35, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per nom. - Hatchens (talk) 16:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: There are references on the page and references on schools that use their products. I just added a link to the page on Yara International School and there are a couple of references to their use on that page.Gusfriend (talk) 02:26, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per Gusfriend. --Vaco98 (talk) 03:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.