Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edumarket game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 18:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Edumarket game

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of this term's use outside this one paper. There may be a WP:COI; see author's username. Alksub 22:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. --דניאל - Danielrocks123 22:33, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete You guys pretty much said it all. Cheers,  Je tL ov e r (talk) 23:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Usage in one (or even a few) papers does not make a term notable. 69.116.62.33 23:50, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism. Brandon97 20:58, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.