Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edupunk (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Edupunk
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

nominating for deletion per WP:NOTDIC. Previously listed for deletion and didn't find consensus. Seems like a flash in the pan. Tdmurlock (talk) 20:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy and Education. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 22:09, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 22:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 22:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - NOTDIC seems like a misguided rationale, as it's an approach to teaching not a word. It got a bunch of coverage in 2008, e.g. Chronicle of Higher Education, a Guardian blog, but the coverage wasn't limited to then. See The Professional Georgrapher in 2018, ICHL in 2011, The Tyee in 2010, Inside Higher Ed in 2010, the book DIY U: Edupunks, Edupreneurs, and the Coming Transformation of Higher Education in 2010... A Google Scholar search returns hundreds of results. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 23:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - The sources provided by more than adequately demonstrate WP:SIGCOV. WJ94 (talk) 13:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article is not a dictionary definition, and I see no challenge to its SIGCOV. Thebiguglyalien  ( talk ) 16:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.