Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Berridge (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:53, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Edward Berridge
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

I could not confirm the notability of this topic through online searches, but was loathe to propose it for deletion without peer review. On the one hand, the information in this article is likely uncontentious and helpful to our readers; on the other hand, we cannot responsibly maintain unsourceable biographies on people of marginal notability. Skomorokh  15:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independant refs. There were none at the first afd either so I don't know why it was kept. He just has a job in publishing, so what? Will change my mind if someone provides a good ref. Szzuk (talk) 15:34, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Starblind's comments at the initial AFD. Has done enough creative work to justify an article, and there's no reason to believe reasonable sourcing can't be developed. We don't need to apply celebrity bio standards to everybody; a stub setting forth his creative work for notable publications is sufficient. If more can be written, that's icing. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:08, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 02:40, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 28 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete lacks sources to prove claims of meeting WP:BIO or WP:CREATIVE. LibStar (talk) 09:10, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.