Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward H. Harlow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:53, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Edward H. Harlow

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have not been able to find any verification for this article. Pretty light on details too. It should be deleted unless someone can find a RS Legacypac (talk) 09:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Didn't actually see active service in WW1, didn't live to be exceptionally old. No obvious reason why we should have an encyclopedia article. --Michig (talk) 10:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete unless reliable, non-trivial sources can be located. All I could find were obituaries, which do not satisfy WP:N. Canadian   Paul  17:58, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. All soldiers in WWI do not automatically get Wikipedia articles because soldier; there has to be something substantive (and, even more importantly, reliably sourced) to write about a soldier than "he lived, he died, the end". But there's no substance, and no viable sourcing, here — being the "last surviving veteran" of a war would be a much more credible claim of notability if he'd actually been to the war, as opposed to just loitering around Halifax as a reservist until that war ended. Bearcat (talk) 21:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.