Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Kay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Clearly passes bio. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 03:46, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Edward Kay

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

notability? PetraSchelm (talk) 19:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete notability, WP:VAIN, WP:SOAP —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 19:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * If the claims in the article were sourced I'd be inclined to vote keep here. Awards won, if true, would indicate a degree of relevance. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 19:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong keep I think its quite noteable. archanamiya  ·  talk  20:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep The awards statements seem to be supported by . Gwguffey (talk) 21:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep The fact that he's an award-winning writer makes him notable. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 02:59, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - article needs sourcing but Gemini Awards makes him notable -- Whpq (talk) 12:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 18:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.