Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Larrikin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 00:17, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Edward Larrikin

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

no references, fails WP:MUSICBIO Dlabtot (talk) 21:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - References in support of notability per WP:CREATIVE can be found. I have added references to the article for his work with "Larrikin Love" and "Patrick Wolf". Untick (talk) 12:40, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The applicable notability guideline is WP:MUSICBIO, not WP:CREATIVE. Dlabtot (talk) 17:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - has notability and references. Needs more and a rewrite but definite keep Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 17:44, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Could you explain why you believe the subject of the article "has notability"? WP:MUSICBIO lists 12 criteria. Which criteria does the subject meet and why? OTOH, a redirect to Larrikin Love may be appropriate. Dlabtot (talk) 18:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.