Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Muhl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. j⚛e deckertalk 13:01, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Edward Muhl

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NN businessman, a studio exec who is not even mentioned in the article on the studio. No indication of notability other than misplaced reliance on some inherited notability from the business. Carlossuarez46


 * He was the head of one of the biggest Hollywood studios in the 1950s and 60s - his name was even on the logo.Dutchy85 (talk) 11:47, 17 September 2014 (UTC) (talk) 21:01, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 17 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep: Another sloppy nomination in a spate of sloppy nominations by the nom over the past couple days. This is one of the poorer ones: did you not check the references in the article?  What the hell?  I just ran "Edward Muhl" + Universal on newspapers.com, which specializes in the pre-modern newspaper cites which particularly apply to the 1950s and 1960s period when Muhl was production chief of Universal, and there are two-hundred and nine cites, quite aside from Muhl's famous public statement that Elizabeth Taylor would never make it.   Ravenswing   04:32, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 01:03, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:55, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, notable studio production executive as Ravenswing says. An chapter about Muhl can be found here. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:42, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Very, very strange nomination that I can't really understand at all. Maybe best just to ignore it. Anyway, thank you to for a fascinating reference. Thincat (talk) 17:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.