Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward R. Vick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Page title is redirected to Vick Foundation. — Cactus Writer (talk) 16:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Edward R. Vick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

selfbio/notability-everything I found on Google are LinkedIn, Facebook, Wikipedia mirrors and selfpub Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - I did find some good coverage here, but it is one of those half interview/half feature articles, and what else I could find in English were interviews, not features to help with WP:GNG. I would quickly vote keep if some good coverage surfaced in other non-English, perhaps Bulgarian sources, but until then, I would recommend a merge to Vick Foundation. Yvarta (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete an interview is not enough to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as simply mirroring what he would advertise to clients, and we never accept this regardless of what else exists, as our policy for it is non-negotiable. SwisterTwister   talk  21:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep without prejudice to merging with Vick Foundation and/or Vick Prize (if someone would write that). Given the currently available coverage, subject seems primarily notable for endowing the prize, and should be covered within an appropriate article rather than a standalone. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 14:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I see no sourced content worth merging. Also note that half of the refs are currently dead. Nothing wrong with redirecting after the page is deleted. czar  06:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Vick Foundation: not independently notable. --Slashme (talk) 08:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.