Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Sexton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 10:15, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Edward Sexton

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article fails WP:GNG due to an on-going lack of significant impact demonstrated in independent sources. The business might have a claim of notability but an article about the tailor does not appear able to address the criteria of WP:BIO. I previously raised this as a PROD, but would prefer wider discussion as this appears to be a marginal case. Fæ (talk) 12:52, 2 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 12:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 12:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 14:07, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per WP:BARE. There are two reliable sources in the article, but it's skimpy. Bearian (talk) 00:59, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Would it not be better practice to consider merging to Savile_Row and considering a new stand-alone article for Nutters of Savile Row which logically ought to have stronger grounds for notability compared to one person within the company? Fæ (talk) 11:12, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Weak keep - There are two sources that discuss the subject in-depth, as noted above. It's a scraper. Tarc (talk) 16:18, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.