Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin Adams Cotto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 21:27, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Edwin Adams Cotto

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article was deleted under PROD but restored several weeks later after a request by the author. The article pretty clearly fails WP:CRIME: there was no renowned victim, and the crime was not perpetrated in any unusual or noteworthy way. The article also fails WP:GNG, assuming it applies, since there is only one reference and no other possible sources are apparent. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:59, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:59, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:59, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:59, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Keep if only because I originated it. I know that's not a good rationale, (to some), but I always vote to keep articles I originated. Otherwise, I'll be honest, I'd vote for delete.Antonio Born super crazy Martin (*singing Duran Duran's "Is There Something I Should Know?") 05:04, 21 December, 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not in any way pass GNG. If people are going to blanket default note keep on any article they started, that would suggest that their vote is not considering the actual notability guidelines. I on the other hand have nominated at least 4 articles I created for deletion over the years. That is in part because I have not always fully grasped the level of sourcing we need to justify an article, but it is probably better than trying to keep any article I created just because I created it.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - not enough coverage to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.