Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin E. Osgood Award


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No compelling, policy-backed arguments have been made for the inclusion of this article. Therefore, this article's subject is found to not have the required notability at this time. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 18:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Edwin E. Osgood Award

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Regional award, not of encyclopedic significance.  DGG ( talk ) 02:31, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

I disagree this award is relevant for Wiki documentation.  Wilkistudent ( talk ) 02:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

This award is relevant for Wikipedia documentation. Its a prestigious award worthy of encyclopedic significance.  AFMRwesternsection ( talk ) 09:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 26.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 02:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  Ross Hill   Talk to me!  03:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non periodical, non significant reward or event fails WP:NEVENTS and WP:GNG. Eduemoni↑talk↓ </b> 04:44, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 19:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />
 * I disagree this award is relevant for Wiki documentation.  Wilkistudent ( talk ) 02:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)


 * This award is relevant for Wikipedia documentation.  Its a prestigious award worthy of encyclopedic significance.  AFMRwesternsection ( talk ) 09:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.