Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin Portillo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I don't think another relist is likely to achieve a clearer consensus. Only one keep has made an effort to explain a rationale though overall I don't think it's clearly a keep outcome. (non-admin closure) Bungle (talk • contribs) 13:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Edwin Portillo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Did not play professionally as a player nor has he managed at a professional level. Simione001 (talk) 00:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 00:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 00:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of El Salvador-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:34, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:46, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:28, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Have you done a decent WP:BEFORE? I did a bit of web searching and feel there is enough to pass WP:GNG. There are news stories for this manager on El Salvador news websites, elsalvador.com, that was one of the latest ones, there are tons of news stories with this managers name on to go through on that website alone. Multiple more news hits on a different site.  there are sources to be found. :/ Govvy (talk) 12:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Where are 2/3 good, in-depth sources? GiantSnowman 10:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 08:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep passes GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 02:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep, clearly passes WP:GNG. A brief web search brings up more than enough verifiable content. --Jimbo[online] 15:10, 7 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.