Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eefoof


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:35, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Eefoof

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Came across this site because it was spammed to my email and I'd never heard of it before. A highbeam search for the original name, eefoof, turns up only two articles. One of them is actually about the website while the other mentions it in passing. A search for the supposed new name, Vume, comes up with nothing related on Highbeeam,

While the page claims to have had extensive coverage in the NYT and WSJ, a search returns nothing.

A regular google search returns some hits, but nothing I would consider substantial.

Looks to be a failed start up from 2006 that may be attempting to rebrand itself (hence the spam), but at the moment I think it fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:CORP.

Just noticed that the page creator, User:Alexannese, seems to have created the account, made this page and then never edited again. I'm guessing it was a PR job or company employee. Sædon talk 19:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No real assertions of notability. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:06, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 05:01, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 21:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.