Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eesti tippmodell (cycle 4)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The arguments don't have the strongest link to policy, but after a month nobody has come along supporting a deletion other than the nominating editor. No prejudice against renomination again in a couple of weeks to try and get a more substantial discussion going. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Eesti tippmodell (cycle 4)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This individual season of a country specific version of this television show fails notability guidelines. Safiel (talk) 02:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  03:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  03:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. The season is just as important as other seasons from NTM series. It also features more references than most of modelling reality-based TV shows. --SkySmileLo (talk) 16:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. This discussion shouldn't be held and the activities of the user who started it really needs to stop his habbit of deleting articles for certain TV shows. Shameless (talk) 21:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. What is the need to delete this? Why don't we all nominate every season of every NTM available for deletion? Maxtron32 (talk) 15:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Keep your comments focused on the merits of the article. I suggest you give a valid reason for keeping the article and refrain from criticizing other editors or commenting on their motives. Comment on the encyclopedia, NOT the editors. Safiel (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.