Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Effective executive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:12, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Effective executive

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This looks like an unambiguous advertisement. In any case, it is not encyclopaedic. Jamesx12345 (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Completed incomplete nom. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 21 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Buzzword with no notability outside of its use as a popular book's title. Not worth merging with Peter Drucker (per the page) since there is little encyclopedic info to move. Alternatively, I would support a page for the renowned book by the same title, but it would require rewriting this article from scratch anyway. czar   &middot;   &middot;  15:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  15:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Yet another management fad buzzword "defined" by lists of glittering generalities. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:00, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. I don't know as I'd go so far as to call it unambiguous advertisement, but it does seem like an advertisement of some sort. Alternatively, redirect to Peter Drucker (and maybe create Effective Executive for proper capitalization of the book, and redirect that as well).  Ignatz mice•talk 05:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Peter Drucker, since it's conceivable that somebody would come looking for it. Ansh666 21:27, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The Effective Executive, the actual title of his book, is already redirecting, so the additional redirect isn't necessary. czar   &middot;   &middot;  00:45, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah, didn't notice that. In that case, delete. Ansh666 01:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.