Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Effects of temperature increase on earthquake frequency


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  DGG ( talk ) 23:35, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Effects of temperature increase on earthquake frequency

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD declined by creator, but this still looks like a mass of original research. Courcelles 22:37, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Well I'd say so. Looks like a big bunch of Original Research thrown together. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 22:40, 7 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. The author of this article has apparently had this research published in no less than four places but since he provides no evidence that anyone has taken any notice of his papers, we can delete it as original research. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:59, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete&mdash;appears to be OR/SYNTH. Not to be mistaken for Pastafarianism. Regards, RJH (talk) 01:32, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete on account of a big bowl of alphabet soup: WP:OR, WP:SYNTH, a distinct smell of WP:ESSAY, probably WP:FRINGE, I could probably go on but I think I've made my point. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR. The first author of the four papers referenced in the article is very likely the same person as Usman727, the creator of the article, hence WP:COI applies. There is also no review of other available literature so fails WP:NPOV. However, I have seen other papers that suggest that global warming and increasing temperatures will increase seismic activity due to melting glaciers etc. having an effect on geophysical processes such as tectonic uplift. See this guardian report or here which was published in Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A. So it is worth a mention somewhere on wikipedia, but this article is purely self promotion of some rather low profile publications and conference proceedings.Polyamorph (talk) 08:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as Not Even Wrong. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:31, 9 October 2011 (UTC).


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:36, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.