Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Efi Thodi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Black Kite (talk) 01:52, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Efi Thodi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Deprodded based on longevity of career, but I see no reliable sources in English or Greek. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * De-speedied, for the record. Searching in Greek will give more sources:  Fences  &amp;  Windows  17:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. I can make sense of most European languages, but Greek is an exception. The nominator says that he has checked Greek sources, so could he please explain why he considers those found by the Google News archive search linked above to be unreliable? Phil Bridger (talk) 21:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The Google News hits seem to be false positives, as none of them match in terms of album names. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:13, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Just from a quick look at the Greek Google News hits these clearly have significant coverage of this article's subject:, , , , . Phil Bridger (talk) 22:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment This person seems to have had a career of some length; most sources will be in the Greek language though. My question: if this article is considered possibly suspect or else in need of work; then why has there been No discussion on the discussion page? Isn't that the correct venue to raise initial concerns? NewbyG  ( talk) 20:34, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources linked by User:Phil Bridger. Translation of found links demonstrates direct detailing of the subject in non-trivial sources. BusterD (talk) 20:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.