Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eflak Stancu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:22, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Eflak Stancu

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete - Clearly a hoax. Probably made up by a turkish fan. Mrromaniac (talk) 06:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't find the player on the Juventus Bucuresti site, nor on the site of the second club in which he is claimed to have played. The only mention I can find is here. While I can't read it myself, and Google Translate seems to produce nothing but a mess, it seems to be saying that Eflak Stancu is a joke. If I'm reading that incorrectly I'm happy to change my position here, but at this stage I'm inclined to agree that it is a hoax. - Bilby (talk) 12:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is not verifiable and fails the general notability guidelines. Xajaso (talk) 22:17, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 15:56, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - possible hoax (though I'm uneasy with the nominator accusing Turkish editors, what evidence do you have?), even if he is real he fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 15:58, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - looks like a hoax to me. Even if it isn't, he very clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT making his existence or non-existence somewhat of a secondary matter. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:35, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.