Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eftandise Hatun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect can be separately created.  Sandstein  18:34, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Eftandise Hatun

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article relies heavily on a single source, yet the other problem is that the only thing that it discusses is her ancestry. A user who has been long working on articles related to the Ottoman dynasty - and happens to be the article's creator - asked me on my talk page to start a deletion discussion for this article as the current info is not enough for having a standalone page about this subject. I also agree because notability is not inherited and this person might not meet the criteria that we have for establishing notability. That is why I decided to put it up for discussion so that the community could decide whether it could stay or not. I think redirecting it to the article about her husband could also be a reasonable option. Keivan.f Talk 05:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  10:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  10:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Probably redirect -- In monogamous Europe, we would certainly regard the spouse of a monarch as notable. IN this case we are dealing with a monarch who probably had a harem of spouses.  The whole article seems to derive from the interpretation of a single title deed, which is nit enough for a stand-alone article.  The problem is that the redirect target is likely hardly to mention the subject, which might instead point to merge or keep.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:09, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Alternatively repurpose into article on the harem of her husband. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:32, 28 November 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:30, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete This is the 2nd time this has been up for deletion.Fails WP:BIO.   scope_creep Talk  14:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per arguments above, lack of substantial sources, and the article's creator requesting deletion(!). jp×g 04:39, 12 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.