Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eggshell planet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Eggshell planet

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:NEO, only the subject of one study, no indication that is a notable topic. Secondary pop-science coverage is reporting on the same study. Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The study in question was published on October 20. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 20:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Thinly rewritten press releases are not suitable building material for an encyclopedia article, and with only one scientific paper, there's not enough to make a case for wiki-notability. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 20:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly not enough reliable coverage for notability. &#12296; Forbes72 &#124; Talk &#12297; 21:53, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons already described above. Not (yet) a notable concept in astrophysics. Aldebarium (talk) 20:50, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom. Clearly not notable.  Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  11:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.