Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egoscue Method


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 11:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Egoscue Method

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested WP:PROD. Fails both general notability guidelines and WP:FRINGE. All sources are primary, promotional, and associated with the product. No coverage in independent, reliable secondary sources, thus no way to build this into anything other than a promotional brochure. See also Articles for deletion/Pete Egoscue. MastCell Talk 17:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTE. Verbal   chat  17:47, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think this article should be deleted. Pete Egoscue's book Pain Free is still being published. The article needs rather some reference to medical evaluations of the Egoscue method. Jim — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.185.201.8 (talk • contribs) (moved from talk by  Verbal   chat  )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:25, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Merely being in print is not even close to meeting WP:N for books.  I've read these books, and the "Egoscue Method" is basically a subset of modern physical therapy -- a bunch of exercises and stretches.  As such, it really isn't its own thing; it's just a brand name.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.