Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egption people


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was article has been deleted by admin. Non-admin closure. Deor 16:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Egption people

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Duplication of article Ancient Egypt that appears copied from another (rather poor) source. Gimme danger 09:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: I find this article fascinating! Did you notice how there's a word search at the bottom?  However, it looks redundant with Ancient Egypt, is mispelled, and may even be a copyvio for all we know, so I say delete. Charlie 10:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to have been cobbled together from a number of sources and shrieks copyvio. I particularly like the instruction - about halfway through - to "open the page with Word 97 or higher, edit if necessary and print". BTLizard 10:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete cobbled together mess as described. Here's an example of a copied-and-pasted source, but I don't have the patience to track down the source of every section. I think it's speediable as a multiple copyvio. Deor 15:26, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.